Automated IT Change Planning

Slides:



Advertisements
Ähnliche Präsentationen
Alexander Stuber & Partner
Advertisements

Cadastre for the 21st Century – The German Way
Service Oriented Architectures for Remote Instrumentation
Pilot training program
Finding the Pattern You Need: The Design Pattern Intent Ontology
Andreas Lill, Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH
Karo IT Viehmarkt Neumarkt Karo IT Neumarkt GmbH | Tel.:
R. Zankl – Ch. Oelschlegel – M. Schüler – M. Karg – H. Obermayer R. Gottanka – F. Rösch – P. Keidler – A. Spangler th Expert Meeting Business.
Microsoft Referenzarchitekturen- Infrastruktur für Connected Systems
Windows Vista Deployment
Dr. M. Schlottke Common Description of Web Services Source: P. Gerbert, 2002 Web Services allow to establish B2B e-commerce on the fly Web Services allow.
fakultät für informatik informatik 12 technische universität dortmund Optimizations Peter Marwedel TU Dortmund Informatik 12 Germany 2009/01/10 Graphics:
Fakultät für informatik informatik 12 technische universität dortmund Specifications Peter Marwedel TU Dortmund, Informatik 12 Graphics: © Alexandra Nolte,
Änderungen bewerten Change_Request.doc Änderungen bewerten Projekt-
Lehrstuhl Informatik III: Datenbanksysteme Andreas Scholz 1 Programming Database Web Applications Web Service Technologies Andreas Scholz.
Architektur von Renardus Göttingen State and University Library, Germany (SUB) Frank Klaproth The Academic Subject.
Lehrstuhl Informatik III: Datenbanksysteme AstroGrid-D Meeting Heidelberg, Informationsfusion und -Integrität: Grid-Erweiterungen zum Datenmanagement.
CTS2 based Terminology Server – Overview – Project eBPG
© TechniData IT-Service GmbH Name Autor Name Datei Monat Jahr Seite 1 Die Cloud – Hype oder mehr? Ralf Wigand Business Development Manager Leiter Rechenzentrum.
Methods Fuzzy- Logic enables the modeling of rule based knowledge by the use of fuzzy criteria instead of exact measurement values or threshold values.
HAW Hamburg, CARPE 2011, Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Weißbach, Revision : Bridging the Communication Gap in IT Projects - Enabling Non-IT Professionals.
Microsoft Office Forms Server
Machen Sie sich schlau am Beispiel Schizophrenie.
Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Forschungsuniversität gegründet 1825 Towards Automatic Composition of Processes based on Semantic.
Fit for Future - English Training Programme HERZLICH WILLKOMMEN ZU UNSERER PRÄSENTATION! ENGLISH TRAINING PROGRAMME.
SOA - Service-orientierte Architekturen
Sanjay Patil Standards Architect – SAP AG April 2008
News von Operations.
A good view into the future Presented by Walter Henke BRIT/SLL Schweinfurt, 14. November 2006.
Vergleich der verschiedenen kommerziellen Datenbanksysteme
Veeam Backup & Replication v5 Usecase: Restore von Anwendungsobjekten ohne Zugriff auf die Infrastruktur Matthias Frühauf System Engineer Central Europe.
Centre for Public Administration Research E-Government for European Cities Thomas Prorok
BAS5SE | Fachhochschule Hagenberg | Daniel Khan | S SPR5 MVC Plugin Development SPR6P.
© All rights reserved. Zend Technologies, Inc. Jan Burkl System Engineer, Zend Technologies Zend Server im Cluster.
| Basel Von der SharePoint Taskliste zum gemanagten Project in Project Server Luca Argentiero Solution Specialist Microsoft
The free XML Editor for Windows COOKTOP Semistrukturierte Daten 1 Vortrag Semistrukturierte Daten 1 COOKTOP The free XML-Editor for Windows
Chair of Informatics III: Database Systems Multi-Core-Algorithmik für Datenbankanwendungen Alfons Kemper, Thomas Neumann, Florian Funke, Henrik Mühe,
Ressourcen in Process-Aware Information Systems Paul Hübner | | DBIS Seminar Betreuer : Andreas Lanz Quelle : Seven Fallacies.
Christian Binder Senior Platform Strategy Manager Microsoft
Quelle: Standish Group, 2006 Fourth Quarter Research Report, CHAOS Research Results.
Department of Computer Science Homepage HTML Preprocessor Perl Database Revision Control System © 1998, Leonhard Jaschke, Institut für Wissenschaftliches.
INTAKT- Interkulturelle Berufsfelderkundungen als ausbildungsbezogene Lerneinheiten in berufsqualifizierenden Auslandspraktika DE/10/LLP-LdV/TOI/
XML IV: Cocoon 2.
© Apr-14 Prof. Dr. Christian Zich, Folie 1 Unternehmensführung / Sendung 11 Neue Managementtrends II.
Institut für Öffentliche Dienstleistungen und Tourismus Informal learning for regional development Manfred Walser Towards a Knowledge Society: Is Knowledge.
SIT-MOON ESPRIT Project Nr st Review, Brussels, 27th of April 1998 slide 1 Siemens AG Österreich Robotiker Technische Universität Wien Politecnico.
Univ.-Lektor Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Markus Schranz staatlich befugter und beeideter Ingenieurkonsulent für Informatik Web Application Engineering & Content Management.
TOGAF - The Open Group Architecture Framework
Berner Fachhochschule Hochschule für Agrar-, Forst- und Lebensmittelwissenschaften HAFL Recent activities on ammonia emissions: Emission inventory Rindvieh.
BASIS - Balanced Scorecards and Strategic Management Information Systems for Public Administrations Björn Niehaves European Research Center for Information.
Office Business Anwendungen mit SharePoint Fabian Moritz | MVP Office SharePoint Server.
3rd Review, Vienna, 16th of April 1999 SIT-MOON ESPRIT Project Nr Siemens AG Österreich Robotiker Technische Universität Wien Politecnico di Milano.
Aufbau der IDES-Modellunternehmung und deren Abbildung in SAP CRM
Basel, September 2, 2008 Work Stream Template: ODM.
Agile ALM for Plex/2E CM MatchPoint ALM. Themen Agenda CM MatchPoint ALM Übersicht CM MatchPoint 5.2 Web und Mobile Entwicklung Agile ALM / DevOps CM.
KIT – die Kooperation von Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH und Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Vorlesung Knowledge Discovery - Institut AIFB Tempus fugit Towards.
1 1 Panda Managed Office Protection Switch from Antivirus to Security as a Service Sales training presentation.
Ressourcen in Process-Aware Information Systems Paul Hübner | | DBIS Seminar Betreuer : Andreas Lanz.
Ressourcen in Process-Aware Information Systems Paul Hübner | | DBIS Seminar Betreuer : Andreas Lanz Quelle : Seven Fallacies.
Ressourcen in Process-Aware Information Systems Paul Hübner | | DBIS Seminar Betreuer : Andreas Lanz.
Ressourcen in Process-Aware Information Systems Paul Hübner | | DBIS Seminar Betreuer : Andreas Lanz.
Fakultät für informatik informatik 12 technische universität dortmund Memory architecture description languages - Session 20 - Peter Marwedel TU Dortmund.
Lehrstuhl für Waldbau, Technische Universität MünchenBudapest, 10./11. December 2006 WP 1 Status (TUM) Bernhard Felbermeier.
© EIPA ALH - slide 1 Innovative Practices in Developing Local Capacities to Apply and Manage EU Funds: The cases of Styria (A) and Scotland (UK)
Draft DSAG-Thementage
Technische Universität München 1 CADUI' June FUNDP Namur G B I The FUSE-System: an Integrated User Interface Design Environment Frank Lonczewski.
TUM in CrossGrid Role and Contribution Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität München Informatik X: Rechnertechnik und Rechnerorganisation.
Structure of architecture documentation
Microsoft Partner Network (MPN)
Studiengang Informatik FHDW
 Präsentation transkript:

Automated IT Change Planning Hauptseminar Hochskalierbare betriebliche Datenbankanwendungen 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Inhalt Motivation ITIL und wichtige Begriffe Vorstellung von 4 Lösungsansätzen Fazit 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Motivation IT-Infrastrukturen müssen hochverfügbar sein Anforderungen und Bedingungen ändern sich häufig, weshalb die IT-Infrastruktur sich ständig ändert Änderungen können zu einer Downtime führen, was im Widerspruch zur Hochverfügbarkeit steht Da Änderungen unumgänglich sind, müssen diese sorgfältig geplant werden, um Downtime zu minimieren Heutige Systeme sind so komplex, dass die Planung lange dauert und somit fehleranfällig wird Wiederkehrende Aufgaben führen zu redundanter Planung 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Motivation Hochverfügbarkeit vs. häufige Änderungen Änderungen müssen sorgfältig geplant werden Planung ist fehleranfällig und häufig redundant 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Exkurs: ITIL IT Infrastructure Library De-facto Standard im Bereich Service Management Sammlung von Good Practices Ziel: Permanente Effizienzsteigerung Quelle: [1] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Change Management Prozess Erfassung & Klassifizierung Planung (& Genehmigung) Implementierung Review Quelle: [2] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Request For Change (RFC) Was? statt Wie? 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Install Linux OS Install Application Server Install Servlet Container Install Servlet „bestsell“ Application Server Database Server Install Table „ITEM“ Install Table „AUTHOR“ Install Table „ORDERS“ Install Table „CUSTOMERS“ Install AIX OS Das Transaction Processing Performance Council, kurz TPC, ist ein 1988 gegründetes Non-Profit-Konsortium aus verschiedenen in der IT-Branche tätigen Unternehmen, das mithilfe standardisierter Benchmarks Angaben über die Leistungsfähigkeit von Transaktionssystemen und Datenbankmanagementsystemen machen möchte. Install Database Quelle: [2] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Lösungen CHAMPS ChangeLedge ChangeLedge + Runtime Constraint-Aware Automated Refinement Hybrid Approach 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CHAMPS Change Management with Planning and Scheduling Alexander Keller (IBM Research) et al. „Achieve a very high degree of parallelism for a set of tasks by exploiting detailed factual knowledge about the structure of a distributed system from dependency information at runtime.“ 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CHAMPS - Architektur Quelle: [3] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

CHAMPS – Dependency Tree Quelle: [3] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

CHAMPS – Task Graph Builder Erstellt den Change Plan aus dem Dependency Tree und dem RFC Nutzt Business Process Execution Language for Webservices (BPEL4WS) <definitions targetNamespace=http://... … </definitions> <process name=„InstallServletOrders“> <partners> <partner name=„InstallServletC ontainer“> </partner> </partners> 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

CHAMPS – Planner & Scheduler Gibt Reihenfolge der Tasks an Bindet Tasks an Server und Ressourcen Legt Zeitpunkt der Ausführung fest Bedingungen: Start/Finish, Colocation, Verfügbare Server, … Optimierungsproblem: Maximierung des Profits (Nutzen – Kosten) Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 App Srv Install Linux OS Install Application Server Install Servlet Container … DB Srv Install AIX OS Install Database Server Install Tables 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

CHAMPS – Vor- und Nachteile Vorteile Hoher Grad an Parallelisierung wird erreicht Zeit für Scheduling skaliert gut mit der Anzahl der Aufgaben Nachteile Generalisierung der Workflows nicht möglich Keine „echte“ Wiederverwendung von Wissen 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning ChangeLedge Template-basierte Wiederverwendung von Wissen und Erfahrungen Luis da Costa Cordeiro (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brasilien) et al. „Use of change templates as a mechanism to formalize, preserve, and reuse the experience accumulated within organizations in relation to IT changes.“ 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

ChangeLedge – IT Infrastructure Model Modell zur Repräsentation jetziger und zukünftiger Infrastruktur-Elemente Wichtigste Elemente: Check: Bedingung, die bei Änderung berücksichtigt werden muss Action: Prozess/Operation zur Änderung eines Software-Elements Quelle: [4] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

ChangeLedge – Request & Plan Template Request Template High Level Enthält nötige Operationen Plan Template Plan, der RFC umsetzt Kernelement von ChangeLedge, da Erfahrungen hauptsächlich hier einfließen Quelle: [4] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

ChangeLedge - Architektur 1: Change Requester starts change process by interacting with the Change Designer. 2: The Config Mgmt Database (CMDB) provides an updated view of the IT infrastructure. Change Requester can identify involved elements. 3: RFC created „from scratch“ or taken from Change Templates repository. Repository provides templates for routine and recurrent changes, called „request templates“ 4: Operator creates a preliminary change plan. Might use „plan templates“ (containing past knowledge) from Change Templates repository. 5: Final refinement of preliminary change plan is done by a „task refiner algorithm“ as part of the Change Planner. 6: Provides information for algorithm about acceptable configurations and dependencies. 7: Resulting change plan can be modified by operator and translated to a workflow language. 8: Operator may invoke execution of the workflow. 9: Provides software packages for execution. 10: After executing the change plan, the CMDB has to be updated with perfomed changes. Request Templates: High level objectives Plan Templates: Containing past knowledge Quelle: [4] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

ChangeLedge – Vor- und Nachteile Vorteile Templates sparen Zeit bei Erfassung und Planung Templates enthalten Erfahrungen von vorherigen Planungen Lässt Generalisierung und Spezialisierung zu Nachteile Sieht keine Optimierung vor Verfeinerung eines Change Plans nur anhand von Abhängigkeiten 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Runtime Constraints Erweiterung von ChangeLedge Bezieht Auswirkungen von früher geplanten Aktivitäten auf später zu planende Aktivitäten ein Luis da Costa Cordeiro (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brasilien) et al. „Automated refinement of runtime constraint-aware change plans, built upon the concept of incremental change snapshots of the target IT environment.“ Nutzung von ChangeLedge bedeutet, dass es das IT Infrastructure Model benutzt. 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Runtime Constraints - Algorithmus Quelle: [5] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Runtime Constraints - Algorithmus Quelle: [5] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Runtime Constraints – Vor- und Nachteile Vorteile Auswirkungen von früheren Aktionen auf spätere werden berücksichtigt Nachteile Möglichkeiten der Verfeinerung hängen stark vom Preliminary Change Plan ab Keine Optimierung 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Hybrid Approach Kombination aus Zuständen und Aktivitäten Sebastian Hagen (TU München) „The algorithm adresses an abstraction mismatch between refinement of tasks and reasoning about the lifecycle and state-constraints of domain objects.“ 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Hybrid Approach – Abstraction Mismatch Verfeinerung von abstrakten in detailierte Change Requests Angabe von Zuständen eines Objekts Quelle: [6] 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Hybrid Approach – Zustände Beispiel 1: Datenbank stoppen Beispiel 2: Webserver starten 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Hybrid Approach - Drawbacks CR1=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) Database : db Running Running start stop CR2 = (“install”, db, [:]) Stopped CR3 = (“start”, db, [:]) install uninstall uninstall Uninstalled 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Hybrid Approach - Drawbacks CR1=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) Database : db Running Running start stop CR3 = (“start”, db, [:]) Stopped install uninstall uninstall Uninstalled 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Hybrid Approach - Architektur 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Hybrid Approach - Beispiel 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Example CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Example CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) Example CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) Example CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) Example CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. …………. 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) Example CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. …………. CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. …………. Example CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. …………. Example CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example Knowledgebase Operators 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example Knowledgebase Domain Object Model +description : String +state : String +version : int LoadBalancer : lb +stop() : boolean +start() : boolean +install(): boolean +uninstall() : boolean Von Operator aufgerufen 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example Knowledgebase Domain Object Model +description : String +state : String +version : int Apache : ap +stop() : boolean +start() : boolean +install(): boolean +uninstall() : boolean called by operator 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example Knowledgebase Domain Object Model +description : String +state : String +version : int Database : db +stop() : boolean +start() : boolean +install(): boolean +uninstall() : boolean Von Operator aufgerufen 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example Knowledgebase Operators 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example Knowledgebase Domain Object Model +description : String +state : String +version : int Database : db +stop() : boolean +start() : boolean +install(): boolean +uninstall() : boolean Von Operator erhöht 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) Example CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. …………. CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) Example 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning CR1=(“patch”, db, [:]) Example CR2=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Stopped]) CR12=(“set-state”, db, [goal : Running]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR9=(“test”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) CR3=(“set-state”, ap, [goal : Stopped]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) …………. …………. CR4=(“set-state”, lb, [goal : Stopped]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:])

Hybrid Approach – Change Plan CR5 = (“stop”, lb, [:]) CR6 = (“stop”, ap, [:]) CR7 = (“stop”, db, [:]) CR8 = (“update”, db, [:]) CR10=(“test1”, db, [:]) CR11=(“test2”, db, [:]) CR13 = (“start”, db, [:]) 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Hybrid Approach – Vor- und Nachteile Vorteile Kombiniert zwei Abstraktionsebenen Berücksichtigt auch Informationen über Zustände von Objekten Nachteile Weiterhin keine Optimierung Unflexibel bei Änderungen der Bedingungen 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Fazit Es existieren verschiedene Ansätze um Change Planning zu automatisieren Alle Ansätze lösen nur ein bestimmtes Problem, eine ganzheitliche Lösung gibt es noch nicht Optimierung bleibt ein offenes Feld 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning

Automated IT Change Planning Quellen [1] http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:ITILV3Prozesse.jpg&filetimestamp=20090120154931 [2] http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITIL [3] „The CHAMPS System: Change Management with Planning and Scheduling“, A. Keller [4] „A Template-based Solution to Support Knowledge Reuse in IT Change Design“, Luis da Costa Cordeiro [5] „A Runtime Constraint-Aware Solution for Automated Refinement of IT Change Plans“, Luis da Costa Cordeiro [6] „One Is Not Enough: A Hybrid Approach for IT Change Planning“, Sebastian Hagen 25. März 2017 Automated IT Change Planning