Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Bildung im internationalen Wettbewerb Nach PISA und IGLU Gesamtschulkongress, Köln, 1. Mai 2003 Andreas Schleicher Head, Indicators and Analysis Division Directorate for Education

Analysieren, vergleichen, und bewerten Kreativ mit Information umgehen Wissen in realitätsnahen Bezügen anwenden PISA Literacy Über die Fähigkeit junger Erwachsener, kreativ und effizient mit schriftlicher Information umzugehen Gedankengänge und Ideen wirkungsvoll mitteilen

Prozentsatz der Schüler pro Kompetenzstufe Lesekompetenz Stufe 2 Stufe 1 Unter Stufe Stufe 5 Stufe 4 Stufe

Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge natürlicher Intelligenz?

Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge natürlicher Intelligenz?

Leistungsunterschiede zwischen den Schulen Leistungsunterschiede innerhalb der Schulen Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge natürlicher Intelligenz?

Leistungsunterschiede zwischen den Schulen Leistungsunterschiede innerhalb der Schulen Unterschiedliche Schulformen Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge natürlicher Intelligenz?

Low Performance High Performance Low Social equity Low performance Low social equity High performance Low social equity Low performance High social equity High performance High social equity High Social equity Italy UK

Low Performance High Performance Low Social equity Low performance Low social equity High performance Low social equity Low performance High social equity. High performance High social equity High Social equity

! ? PISA Bildungsergebnisse und Verankerung effektiver Lernstrategien Leistungsgefälle zwischen Schülern und Schulen Chancengleichheit IGLU

The expansion of upper secondary education Percentage of the population that has attained at least upper secondary education, by age group

The expansion of university education Percentage of the population that has attained Tertiary Type A education, by age group 24 12

Entry rates to tertiary education Sum of net entry rates over single years of age in tertiary-type A and tertiary-type B education

Private rate of return to tertiary education r Ergebnis für Männer in D -1.5% Höhere Steuern (OECD -1.3%) -0.3% Gebühren (OECD -1.5%) +7.1% Studiendauer (OECD +11.4) +1.1% Verringerte Arbeitslosigkeit (OECD +0.7%) +2.6% Staatl. Unterstützung (OECD +2.5%) +8.5% Jährlicher Gesamtertrag (OECD 11.8%)

… die Konsequenzen... Ein Beispiel: Bildungsbeteiligung und Wirtschaftswachstum

Overall outcomes of education Output of institutions and institutional performance Quality and distribution of knowledge and skills System-wide structures, resources and policies The learning environment at school Teaching and learning practices and classroom climate Individual attitudes, engagement and behaviour National educational, social and economic context Community and school characteristics Student learning conditions and teacher working conditions Background of the learners Strategische Bildungsziele Outputs and Outcomes Impact of Learning Policy Levers That shape Outcomes Antecedents that contextualise or constrain policy Country or system Schools and other institutions Instructional settings Individual learner Quality of instructional delivery

Student engagement in reading Highest engagement Lowest engagement Low Performance High Performance Low Social equity. High Social equity

E.g. Learning environment and course offering High degree of autonomy Low degree of autonomy % Variance between schools Low Performance High Performance Low Social equity. High Social equity 7% 9% 11% 76% 75% 71% 20% r=.51

Early selection and institutional stratification Low degree of stratification High degree of stratification Low Performance High Performance Low Social equity. High Social equity

Effects of students and schools socio-economic background on student performance (Effects associated with half a standard deviation on the socio-economic index)

Weitere Informationen l l l l …and remember: Without data, you are just another person with an opinion