Präsentation herunterladen
Die Präsentation wird geladen. Bitte warten
Veröffentlicht von:Rosalind Still Geändert vor über 10 Jahren
1
Model predictions of greenhouse gas emission at a regional scale
Feedback from terrestrial productivity changes to the climate Model predictions of greenhouse gas emission at a regional scale Klaus Butterbach-Bahl Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU) Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
2
Physico-chemical environment
Global Changes and soil N2O and CH4 exchange Change Manag. Nitrification Denitrification CH4-Prod. CH4-Oxid. Biospere-Atmosphere Exchange of CH4 & N2O Land use (radiat., soil T& - moist., compact., O2, C/N avail.) Physico-chemical environment Soil C and N turnover Soil microbial community Precip. Temp. Climate change Plant litter (QA/QN) & Exudation Plant Physiology (WUE, Photosynthesis) Plant species composition CO2 N-Dep. (O3, …) Atmosph. Compos.
3
Understanding the environmental feedbacks between C and N cycling
VOC Increased SOC NOx CO2 90% N2O +soil microbial activity N- cycling 60-70% Photosynthesis -O2 avail. +DOC CH4 Isoprenoid- production 60-70% Increased N2O Nitrification Denitrification CH4-Oxidation Methanogenesis
4
The challenge: Regional fluxes
Bridging the gap: process understanding ↔ ecosystem/ regional fluxes Empirical/ statistical approaches for inventories IPCC and emission factors Robust (most likely), but can hardly be used for evaluating land use/ land management strategies, or assessing climate-biosphere feedbacks Process oriented modeling DayCent, DNDC, CERES, COUP, etc. Complex processes descriptions, high parameter demand still need further development and UC assessment, but provide realistic simulation of ecosystem processes allow to test hypotheses, can be used to assess global change feedbacks 4 | V. Name | Organisationseinheit | TT.MM.JJJJ
5
Process oriented modeling of biosphere-atmosphere exchange
6
GIS coupling for GIS – the problem of data
GIS database for DNDC Data source Data content format ISRIC- WISE ESDB v1 Clay content pH bulk density Polygon 10km x 10km Grid Spatial information SOIL Map of Topsoil OrganicCarbon SOC 1x1 km2 Grid GIS DATABASE MM5 Temperature Precipitation PAR Latitude 10x10 km2 Grid CLIMATE EMEP N deposition 50x50 km2 Grid DNDC CAPRI Crop type/area 1x1 km2 Grid EUStat Fertilizer input Yield (kg/ha) NUTS Regions MANAGEMENT Emission Inventory of European agricultural soils LUCAS Sowing and Harvest date (2003) Points
7
Global N2O budget
8
Model testing
9
Model testing
10
Model testing
11
Model testing Simulated N2O-emissions [g N ha-1]
Motivation Strategy Sites&Methods Results Australia Global Outlook Simulated N2O-emissions [g N ha-1] Measured N2O-emissions [g N ha-1]
12
Global GIS
13
Global GIS
14
Global GIS
15
Global N2O inventory Werner et al., 2007, JGR – Global Biogeochem. Cycl.
16
Interannual variability
Werner et al., 2007, JGR – Global Biogeochem. Cycl.
17
Comparison with earlier estimates
What is the area we are talking about? (all N2O emissions scaled to the area used in this study; orange: scaled / white: original) Matson and Vitousek 1990: 1.8 Tg N yr-1 (2.4 Tg N yr-1) Bouwman et al. 1995: 1.5 Tg N yr-1 (2.3 Tg N yr-1) Potter 1998: Tg N yr-1 Breuer et al. 2000: Tg N yr-1 (3.55 Tg N yr-1) Stehfest and Bouwman 2006: 1.5 Tg N yr-1 (1.17 Tg N yr-1) This study: Tg N yr-1 (± 0.3 SD) Werner et al., 2007, JGR – Global Biogeochem. Cycl.
18
Predictions for Europe
GIS database for DNDC Data source Data content format ISRIC- WISE ESDB v1 Clay content pH bulk density Polygon 10km x 10km Grid Spatial information SOIL Map of Topsoil OrganicCarbon SOC 1x1 km2 Grid GIS DATABASE MM5 Temperature Precipitation PAR Latitude 10x10 km2 Grid CLIMATE EMEP N deposition 50x50 km2 Grid DNDC CAPRI Crop type/area 1x1 km2 Grid EUStat Fertilizer input Yield (kg/ha) NUTS Regions MANAGEMENT Emission Inventory of European agricultural soils LUCAS Sowing and Harvest date (2003) Points
19
Identifying key regions and interannual variabilities
20
Identifying key regions
Crop yield - statistics Simulated N2O Simulated NO3 leaching Crop yield - DAYCENT Del Grosso et al., 2006, J. Env. Qual.
21
Inventorying soil N trace gas fluxes and identifying feedbacks
NO Emissions Minimum Scenario kt N a-1 Average Scenario Maximum Scenario 1990 1995 2000 45 38 98 85 99 248 220 254 Simulated forest area of Europe: km2
22
Climate change feedbacks
( ) - ( ) [A2 scenario] ECHAM4 MCCM/MM5 regionalisation (60kmx60km)
23
Climate change feedbacks ( 2031-2039) - (1991-2000)
Seasonal changes in soil moisture Kesik et al., 2006, JGR - Biogeosciences 23 | V. Name | Organisationseinheit | TT.MM.JJJJ
24
Climate feedbacks on forest soil N2O/NO emissions
Temp. Precip. Kesik et al., 2006, JGR - Biogeosciences
25
Climate feedbacks on forest soil N2O/NO emissions
Kesik et al., 2006, JGR - Biogeosciences 25 | V. Name | Organisationseinheit | TT.MM.JJJJ
26
Climate feedbacks on N2O/N2 ratio. Is this realistic?
Kesik et al., 2006, JGR - Biogeosciences
27
+ − + + + + ? + − ? + + ? − + + − + ? ? ? N-Cycle Carbon Cycle
Land use change Fossil fuel burning Industrial N2 fixation Human drivers + − + + + Atmospheric CO2 Atmospheric reactive N Atmospheric drivers Climate warming + ? + − ? ? + + ? Primary production Carbon Cycle N2 fixation − ? C/N ratio + + Biogeochemical Cycles Biologically Available N − + ? Denitrification N-Cycle Gruber & Galloway, Nature 2008
28
Summary Nr emission/ deposition processes are by far more complex as compared to e.g. CO2-exchange processes, due to Complexity of involved processes Complexity of feedbacks to environmental drivers Nr cascading on landscape/regional and global scales Understanding of microbial production and consumption processes under changing environmental conditions is still incomplete, and Link between process understanding, field observations and model implementation cannot always be established Closing the N cycling remains difficult due to uncertain N2 losses Long-term measurements are needed [holistic approach] Models need to address the regional scale and linking of biogeochemical models to hydrological models is needed
29
C-N BIOTRANSFORMATIONS
Process oriented modeling of ecosystem N- (C-) fluxes Atmospheric N input Human management Atmosphere PLANT PROCESSES Phenology Ressource capture Partitioning Senescence Biomass removal CO2, N2O, NH3, NO Crop type/ fertilization crop residues absorption SOIL TRANSFERS Heat (Fourier) Water (Tipping bucket) Nitrate (Convective) mineral N organic N Tillage/ drainage C-N BIOTRANSFORMATIONS Mineralisation - Immobilisation Nitrification - Denitrification Soil drainage, nitrate leaching Groundwater
30
Conceptual model of an anaerobic balloon
aerobic soil matrix CH4-consumption CO2 CH4 anaerobic soil matrix DOC CH4 CO2 CH4-production denitrification NO3- → NO2- → NO → N2O → N2 N2O NO NO3- NO2- NH4+ nitrification
31
Model evaluation: SOC dynamics
Illinois, USA Rothamsted, UK wheat/fallow barley/potato/wheat/sugarbeet Winter wheat Bad Lauchstädt, Germany Waite, Australia Li, Frolking, Butterbach-Bahl, Climatic Change, 2005
32
Model evaluation: N2O fluxes
Li, Frolking, Butterbach-Bahl, Climatic Change, 2005
33
Model evaluation: NO fluxes [forests]
Kesik et al., 2006, Biogeosciences
34
34 | V. Name | Organisationseinheit | TT.MM.JJJJ
35
Eh changes driven in CH4/N2O fluxes in rice paddies
Li et al., 2005,Glob.Biogeochem. Cycl.
36
Model evaluation: Soil water fluxes
Altdorf Flossenbürg
Ähnliche Präsentationen
© 2024 SlidePlayer.org Inc.
All rights reserved.